Template:Rfc

模板文档

  You may be looking for Template:R from CamelCase.

  You may be looking for help automatic linking to the Internet standards documents known as Requests for Comments, which can be found at {{IETF RFC}}.

用法编辑

{{rfc|topic}}

如果要標記徵求意見討論串，請使用本模板。本模板應該立即放在包含簽名（或時間戳記）的請求內容前面。不要以Wiki連結放置本模板；這可能會導致格式錯誤。

本模板和徵求意見本身應該放置在與徵求意見主題相關的討論頁面上，或是可以新建一個專門用於徵求意見的頁面。

同一標籤中可以包含多達10個主題，如：{{rfc|主題1|主題2}}.

Within an hour or two after the edit has been saved, Legobot（讨论 | 貢獻） will add an |rfcid= parameter to the template, and will also add the discussion to the lists of RfCs that are indicated by the topic area parameters, e.g. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies if the topic area |bio was specified. Do not add |rfcid= without a value; do not choose your own value for the |rfcid= parameter, or re-use a value that is in use (or was previously used) on another RfC – instead, always let Legobot select a value. If you would like to add another topic area to the RfC after Legobot has already processed the {{rfc}} tag, simply add the additional topic(s) to those already within the tag, before the |rfcid= parameter; Legobot will notice the addition and add the discussion to the new RfC topic pages.

Do not include any opening html tags (e.g., <small>) in the initial RfC statement unless its corresponding closing tag (e.g., </small>) also comes before the first timestamp, i.e., don't "straddle" the first timestamp inside html code, otherwise it may corrupt the entry of the RfC on the topic discussion pages.

If Legobot finds two or more {{rfc}} templates on the same page which do not yet have an |rfcid= parameter, it is liable to assign the same |rfcid= to different RfCs (example), with the consequence that only one of them is publicised (example). If it is felt necessary to hold two or more RfCs on the same page, the discussions may be started together but you should add the {{rfc}} template to just one discussion at a time, and wait for Legobot to set an |rfcid= on that one before you add an {{rfc}} template to another discussion.

If you find a page with two or more {{rfc}} templates that have the same value for the |rfcid= parameter, remove that parameter from the {{rfc}} template which occurs first on the page, wait for Legobot to assign a fresh value, and check for further duplication.

If giving an example of the use of this template, do not use the construct <nowiki>{{rfc}}</nowiki> because the bot may consider that it is an actual RfC, and will add an RFC ID or remove the template entirely, as it sees fit. Instead, use one of the template-linking templates such as {{tlx}}, as in {{tlx|rfc|bio}} which produces {{rfc|bio}}.

Note: It is a very good idea to let the section heading begin with "RfC" or "Request for comment", as for example "RfC: Past or present tense for television series?"

期限编辑

The template does not provide a parameter for an expiry date. The bot will look for the first datestamp that occurs in the page text at any point after the template, and will treat that as the starting time for the RfC, and will remove the template thirty days after that time. If the {{rfc}} template is added at the top of an existing thread where discussion has been going on for some time, it is important to add some text that includes the current timestamp between the {{rfc}} template and the first posting, so that the RfC runs its full thirty days (example).

主題領域定義编辑

致模板編輯員编辑

It looks to be the case that Legobot will fail to remove RfCs if there are any parameters on the RfC tag other than the categories and the |rfcid= parameter that Legobot sets. Be cautious when adding new parameters, even no-op parameters, as this may cause Legobot to behave unpredictably.

參見编辑

• WP:關閉討論
• WP:爭議解決指引
• WP:徵求意見

其他模板

• {{RFC countdown}} - clearly communicate time remaining on RFC
• To archive a RfC discussion, use these two templates: {{archivetop}}, {{archivebottom}}
• {{Cite IETF}}, a different type of RFC
• {{IETF RFC}}, the same different type of RFC
• {{Draft RfC}}, for RfC drafts not yet open for comment